Всего за 400 руб. Купить полную версию
The next, fourth, chapter begins with a very truthful remark that fully confirms our doubts about the events in chapter 3 however, it is not clear, again, to what time and place this remark refers. So.
1 When Jesus learned about the rumor that reached the Pharisees that He makes disciples and baptizes more than John,. Interesting -the Pharisees got worried, their chosen prophet was offended, a competitor appeared. But what about the fact that John led a sermon against the official church, and took away from its legal income by baptizing for the forgiveness of sins instead of through sacrifice? Is it okay that everyone went to him to be baptized for the remission of sins, all the people and did not want to go to church any more? Moreover, he preached some other god, his own, not Jehovah for this they stoned in Judea without further clarification.
2 although Jesus Himself did not baptize, but His disciples and here is the moment of Truth: Jesus Himself did not baptize anyone because he did not see the point in pouring water from the river. God forgives because he is the Father, and not because someone doused himself with water or, worse, sacrificed someone elses life for his sin. This is a fundamental difference between the teaching of love and ordinary ancient paganism.
The disciples, who before Jesus were mantas and disciples of John, baptized: they followed, as they say, in the footsteps of their (former) teacher, deciding that this would attract more people to Jesus. He, as usual, did not mind, until, in fact, the crowds went to them to be baptized and then He just got up and silently left the Jordan, where apparently his disciples were training for the baptists and they sadly trailed after him, leaving their water entertainments.
3 that he left Judea and went back to Galilee. 4 He had to go through Samaria but He did not go to any Judea, we have already clarified this above, and began his sermon in his homeland, in Galilee, which is confirmed by Marcion in his much more logical novel The Gospel of the Lord. But for further narration, the return home from the pilgrimage to Jerusalem is simply necessary, since the path from Jerusalem (and not from the Jordan, where he allegedly baptized) lies through Samaria, where He was destined for, as arranged by authors of gospel of John, an important meeting.
5 So He comes to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near the parcel of land that Jacob gave to his son Joseph. 6 Jacobs well was there. Jesus, tired from the journey, sat down by the well. It was about six oclock. 7 A woman from Samaria comes to fetch water. Jesus says to her: give me a drink. 8 For His disciples have gone into the city to buy food. The whole crowd went, leaving Him alone? Did each of them buy food for himself alone? Well, if they had sent Judas with a box of money, he would have hired a trolley and rolled food lope while everyone was resting.
And the main question if everyone went to the city, who recorded the conversation with the Samaritan woman? Jesus himself would not paint the details for the disciples, it is specifically said about this that none of them asked Him what the conversation was about. This is indicated in order to show their shock: because supposedly they are Jews and so for them she is untouchable, and He is talking to her. But unexpectedly, this propaganda of the disciples Judaism turns against itself: it means that there were simply no witnesses of this story, nor his story about speaking with the Samaritan woman simply did not happen. And the evangelist has nowhere to take the material for this conversation from. The evangelists have done this more than once, and we will return to this argument more than once. This means that the whole subsequent story about the conversation with the Samaritan woman should go to the dump, it is made up by someone unknown, again. However, it is still worth dwelling on a couple of points to highlight the crude and shameless Judeo propaganda:
How are you, being a Jew; I know that the Messiah is coming, that is, Christ is I who speak to you; Isnt He the Christ? the deliberate obsessive propaganda of Jesus Judaism. The cherry on top is: 21 Jesus says to her: Believe me that the time is coming when you will not worship the Father either on this mountain nor in Jerusalem.
22 You do not know what you bow down to, but we know what we bow down to, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 But the time will come, and has already come, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such worshipers for Himself24 God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.
That is they first corrected the actual record of Jesus: the time is coming when you will not worship the Father either on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. The time will come and has already come when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth because the Father is looking for such worshipers so this is forged to fit Judaism because the middle is simply inserted we know what we bow to, for salvation is from the Jews,and it doesnt matter that this blunt insert looks like a saddle on a cow. And then all this Judaized construction is recognized as suitable for the fictional event of the meeting of a Jew with a Samaritan woman the people are stupid and still will not understand anything about the spirit, nor the truth, nor about the Father, Whom they cleverly substituted for the same ancient pagan idol. And then all this already Judaized construction is recognized as suitable for the fictional event of the meeting of Jesus the Jew with the Samaritan woman. For the sake of this single genuine phrase the time is coming and it has already come when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father is looking for such worshipers, its consistent multi-level distortion in the spirit of Jesus commitment to Judaism in order to hide its truly epochal revolutionary significance, Jesus key statement. The whole story of the Samaritan woman was invented. And the whole conversation was built around this phrase, in order to disguise and hide its true meaning as much as possible. They could not just throw out this greatly important, and, apparently, widely known among the disciples utterance of Jesus, the Judaizers still did not dare. Instead, they took a long detour, by which they took Jesus first to Jerusalem and then back to Galilee through Samaria.
It is pertinent to note here that the philosophical concept of Salvation, developed in Hellenic Christianity much later, was generally absent in Judaism of that time: salvation from what if in Jewish religion the very concept of the afterlife of the soul was absent?
Lets go further. She left and meanwhile the disciples came with food. And then Jesus throws a capricious fit why would he?
31 Meanwhile the disciples asked Him, saying: Rabbi! Eat 32 But He said to them: I have food which you do not know. 33 Therefore the disciples said among themselves, Has anyone brought Him to eat? 34 Jesus says to them: My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me and to complete His work. 35 Do you say that there are still four months and the harvest will come? But I say to you: lift up your eyes and look at the fields, how they have become white and ripe for the harvest. 36 He who reaps receives a reward and gathers fruit for eternal life, so that he who sows and he who reaps will rejoice together, 37 for in this case the saying is true: one sows, and the other reaps. 38 I sent you to reap what you did not work for: others worked, but you entered into their labor