Marshall M.G. Polity IV project, political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2015 / Center for systemic peace. – 2016 b. – Mode of access: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4v2015.xls (Дата посещения: 05.08.2016.)
Marshall M.G. Major episodes of political violence (MEPV) and conflict regions, 1946–2015. – 2016 a. – Mode of access: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/ MEPVcodebook2015.pdf (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
Mazzuca S.L., Munck G.L. State or democracy first? Alternative perspectives on the state-democracy nexus // Democratization. – L., 2014. – Vol. 21, N 7. – P. 1221–1243.
McGuire J.W. Political regime and social performance // Contemporary Politics. – L., 2013. – Vol. 19, N 1. – P. 55–75.
Melville A., Stukal D., Mironyuk M. Trajectories of regime transformation and types of stateness in post-communist countries // Perspectives on European politics and society. – L.: Taylor & Francis, 2013. – Vol. 14, N 4. – P. 431–459.
Migdal J.S. Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1988. – 320 p.
Møller J., Skaaning S.E. Stateness first? // Democratization. – L., 2011. – Vol. 18, N 1. – P. 1–24.
Nettl J.P. The state as a conceptual variable // World politics. – Cambridge, 1968. – Vol. 20, N 4. – P. 559–592.
O’Donnell G., Schmitter P.C., Whitehead L. Transitions from authoritarian rule: comparative perspectives. – Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1986. – 208 p.
Olson M. Dictatorship, democracy, and development // American political science review. – Cambridge, 1993. – Vol. 87, N 3. – P. 567–576.
Ottervik M. Conceptualizing and measuring state capacity. – Gothenburg, 2013. – Vol. 2013, N 20. – 39 p. – (QoG Working Paper Series).
Political atlas of the modern world / A. Melville (ed.). – Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. – 256 p.
Roberts C., Sherlock T. Bringing the russian state back in: explanations of the derailed transition to market democracy // Comparative politics. – N.Y., 1999. – P. 477–498.
Roller E. Comparing the performance of autocracies: issues in measuring types of autocratic regimes and performance // Contemporary politics. – L.: Taylor & Francis, 2013. – Vol. 19, N 1. – P. 35–54.
Rose R., Shin D. Democratization backwards: the problem of third-wave democracies // British journal of political science. – Cambridge, 2001. – Vol. 31, N 2. – P. 331–354.
Rotberg R.I. The challenge of weak, failing, and collapsed states // Leashing the dogs of war. – Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, 2007. – P. 83–94.
Rustow D.A. Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model // Comparative politics. – N.Y., 1970. – Vol. 2, N 3. – P. 337–363.
Scheuerman W.E. Postnational democracies without postnational states? Some skeptical reflections // Ethics & Global politics. – Stockholm, 2009. – Vol. 2, N 1. – P. 41–63.
Schmitter P., Wagemann C., Obydenkova A. Democratization and state capacity // Paper for X Congresso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administracion Publica. – Santiago, Chile, 2005. – Mode of access: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/clad/clad0052201.pdf (Дата посещения: 05.08.2016.)
Singer J.D., Bremer S., Stuckey J. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965 // Peace, war, and numbers / B. Russett (ed.). – Thousand Oaks, 1972. – 352 p.
Slater D. Can Leviathan be democratic? Competitive elections, robust mass politics, and state infrastructural power // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). – Berlin, 2008. – Vol. 43, N 3–4. – P. 252–272.
Soifer H. State infrastructural power: approaches to conceptualization and measurement // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). – Berlin, 2008. – Vol. 43, N 3–4. – P. 231–251.
Soifer H., Vom Hau M. Unpacking the strength of the state: the utility of state infrastructural power // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). – Berlin, 2008. – Vol. 43, N 3–4. – P. 219–230.
Spruyt H. The sovereign state and its competitors: An analysis of systems change. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1996. – 304 p.
Svolik M.W. The politics of authoritarian rule. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2012. – 258 p.
Tansey O. Democratization without a state: democratic regime-building in Kosovo // Democratization. – L., 2007. – Vol. 14, N 1. – P. 129–150.
The logic of political survival / B. Bueno de Mesquita, A. Smith, R. Siverson, J. Morrow. – Cambridge; L.: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. – 550 p.
The performance of nations / J. Kugler, R.L. Tammen (eds). – Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield publishers, 2012. – 348 p.
Thies C.G. Of rulers, rebels, and revenue: state capacity, civil war onset, and primary commodities // Journal of peace research. – Thousand Oaks, 2010. – Vol. 47, N 3. – P. 321–332.
Thompson W.R., Ganguly S. Ascending India and its state capacity. – New Haven: Yale univ. press, 2016. – 352 p.
Tilly Ch. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1990. – Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990. – 288 p.
Tilly Ch. Democracy. – Cambridge, N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2007. – 248 p.
Tilly Ch., Ardant G. The formation of national states in Western Europe. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1975. – 711 p.
Transformation index BTI 2016 // Bertelsmann Stiftung. – Mode of access: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/de/unsere-projekte/transformationsindex-bti/ (Дата посещения: 25.07.2016.)
Weede E. Political regime type and variation in economic growth rates // Constitutional political economy. – Dordrecht, 1996. – Vol. 7, N 3. – P. 167–176.
Wintrobe R. The tinpot and the totalitarian: an economic theory of dictatorship // American political science review. – Cambridge, 1990. – Vol. 84, N 3. – P. 849–872.
Эффективность государства: новые подходы 9
Аннотация. В статье представлен анализ современных подходов к исследованию эффективности государственной власти, особое внимание уделяется двум ключевым: организационному, направленному на исследования микроуровня, и институциональному, ориентированному на межстрановые сравнения. Автор указывает на возможность синтеза данных подходов с помощью метода оболочечного анализа (Data Envelopment Analysis). Автором проводится эмпирическое исследование региональных систем здравоохранения в России и Канаде, иллюстрирующее преимущества оболочечного анализа при изучении эффективности государства.
Ключевые слова: эффективность государства; оболочечный анализ; Data Envelopment Analysis; эффективность общественного сектора; эффективность здравоохранения.
E.A. Yureskul
State effectiveness: New approaches
Abstract. The article deals with contemporary approaches to state effectiveness research. The author compares the advantages and drawbacks of two key approaches prevailing in the field: the organizational approach, dealing with micro-level research; and the institutional approach, aimed at state-level comparative research. There is a way to combine the advantages of these approaches when using Data Envelopment Analysis. The author conducts an empirical research into Russian and Canadian public health care systems to illustrate the advantages of using DEA when analyzing state effectiveness.