Chapter 6
Where did the Kazakhs bourgeois come from
There are objective practices for the emergence of the bourgeoisie.
Conservative communities do not welcome the movement. The bourgeoisie appeared just from the movement of superfluous people because in every traditional family, ten children are born. Not necessarily every tenth of a litter of many children, having many children as a condition, as a guarantee of escape of folk: many descendants of the bourgeois appeared in the cities from landlessness, that is, from poverty.
In order for people to understand the need for cooperation, they had to live in a peasant community themselves. Both in rural areas and in cities, cooperation was a guarantee of survival. So in Europe, workshops appeared in medieval cities. Why couldn't Kazakhs create workshops?
Who among the Kazakhs in general could be the first to turn into the bourgeoisie, given that the Kazakhs did not like money. Like all peoples of the tradition, the Kazakhs loved glory. Thats just out of love for status and contempt for the worthless, however, this feeling is familiar to the whole world, all peoples, Kazakhs appeared candidates for the bourgeoisie according to the Western type of maturation. If we take into account that the nomads did not like cities where strategic cooperation of the Kazakhs could take place. We need to find the reason the Kazakh cooperation without relation to the main Kazakh attribute belonging to the Kazakh clan (ru). Poverty and rootlessness are the two main bourgeois assets. All the beggars and the rootless want to become famous, so that they are still respected it is fact.
If we remove the upper cooperation (in the revcon, this is called the upper dubbing, when the elite of the people is duplicated by another elite, necessary for the creation of a bourgeois class. Without the solidarity of former beggars who have turned into oligarchs, no modernization is possible. To create an industry, it is not at all a nomadic, not other primitive and feudal elite that is needed. All this traditional old elite should disappear. As practice shows, the primitive elite is destroyed by the new people themselves «in the name of progress». None of these people will change old habits. Im talking about the personal egoism of the feudal elite, about reforms changing the stereotype of the behavior of the whole people is out of the question. In order for new people to appear, a crowd of rootless people must appear when people do not remember their relatives. If people remember about pas kind, only external intervention is possible this is an external double of self reflection, when representatives of other peoples act as teachers), or you can immediately get into the prosak. Yes, these reform teachers are destroying the selfish feudal elite in the name of progress. The versions that the primitive elites themselves will go to voluntary poverty in order to turn into the bourgeoisie seem to be seditious devilry, market demagogy. Japanese samurai would never agree to trade in order to retain power. Those who claim that the Kazakh primitive elite would have shown miracles of selflessness in the name of the people, would have led reforms, that is, ruined themselves and butchered themselves to the head in order to look like beggars, for this the people themselves had to take place, that is, a crowd of rootless scoundrels demanding for self a couple of hundred sheep from them. The bourgeoisie is formed from dirt and shit. From dirt, from conservative shit! This dirt and shit should be eaten by all future oligarchs, as the most unscrupulous people for tradition.
Zhataks (recumbent men) poor Kazakhs, weeded out by Kazakh relatives for their inability to maintain movement could be the first to render in a foreign environment and in foreign cities, fate itself gives a chance to such all the poor. If they did not feel alienated from exactly the same generic dregs, some despicable Sarts should have felt contempt for exactly the same Kazakhs from other clans instead of being ready to cooperate. (Kazakhs do not let strangers, that is, not relatives Kazakhs into the Nauryz pagan wise holiday yurt even now! And they stuttering about the Kazakh strategic cooperation. This is an absent Kazakh feeling) It is they who could establish cooperation. If not for one thing that It is precisely that the Kazakhs all remember their kinds. With this memory they build their modern power. And at the same time they walk with the illusion that it is possible to build democracy at the same time. What each Kazakh has under democracy is a separate topic. And this topic does not go far from the Kazakh self -reflection.
Chapter 7
Why the American Indians lost. The Path of Big Wings
There are notes of Columbus about the meeting of Indians with Europeans. There he described them as resembling children. This is true, including in the matter of strategic cooperation. An Indian of any age is not authorized to meet an enemy or relative, but people whose strategic cooperation literally replaces the smell of blood: if their own blood, if thia man their tribe that man is a friend, if not their own blood, it is a member of another tribe. If the same Indians had been in the place of Columbus' sailors, the first Indians might have eaten them. As it was, their curiosity kept Columbus alive. He saw not children, but unauthorized Indians for such meetings.
When the settlers who arrived from the Atlantic side created settlement agglomerations for several generations, they began to penetrate deep into the American continent, the Indians showed their inferiority-complete incompetence. Apart from guerrilla tactics, they had nothing to oppose the white people. Of course, they created tribal alliances, but this was not enough for a strategic confrontation. White people surpassed the Aborigines not only in weapons and tactics, but most importantly, the whites had the ability to cooperate, to cooperate on the basis of the small interests of the small owners. The great Indian myths could not help them in any way because the Indians were not capable of cooperation, joint actions, except for the "warpath" based on the interest of blood. Without the most extreme need, the tribes are not capable of cooperation, in order for the Zerefs to have a strategic friendship this is only when there is a war and when on the edge of the abyss. In other cases, the Zerefs will look at you for a long time to come forward, or to trample you. All other meetings of the Zerefs outside their ancestral villages are a meeting of warriors and knight riders a meeting of two wolves, rather jackals. This policy is maintained until the very last moment. (When a Kazakh looks at a Kazakh, he does not just look at the "knight", he is a "cozben atada" (shoots with his eyes). Most likely, the Indians also looked at each other with heavy eyes without blinking at a chance meeting, creating a heavy look).
The Indian elite, Indian leaders, Indian shamans also could not do anything, could not help their peoples in any way. The fate of the Indians is sad. Too many tribes too many «states». They were with the elite also incapable of a strategic agreement. Let savages go the way of heroes. All tribes followed the path of tribal glory. No conservative people at the stage of «naturals» are able to survive if they are surrounded by small people who can win without blood, without a fight just by selling and buying. People came to the Indians who were able to unite for small gain, create punitive detachments. From the particular to the general. This is what distinguishes the petty bourgeois (zere, refags) from the generally wild people who shoot at each other all the time with their eyes. The «path of heroes», the «path of glory», which distinguishes all conservative peoples, dooms such an elite to death in the first place. These people would never have adapted to the «white» trick. Most of the people simply have to die after their own elite, because apart from curiosity, then complexes after the first realization of their impotence, these people are not capable of anything. This is the fatal tax of all conservative peoples until the savages assimilate the first skills of cooperation except kinship, except blood. This means that the entire older generation of the «curious» should also have gone to the valley of death, all barbarians are very persistent, stupidly stubborn when they try to retrain them even with the help of violence. The colonizers even had to import Negroes from faraway Africa to the plantations. By the way, African leaders sold young, physically strong people. For during a storm, swifts with medium wings survive. Those who have too big wings are carried away by the wind, those who have short wings, they themselves fall to the ground and break. So, in order to assimilate the Tatar tribe, Genghis Khan executed all adults, leaving only children who could pass under the cart.