Jiang believed that using such an amplifier could be quite harmful. He limited the session time to 45 minutes and the number of sessions in the course to 21, did not allow consecutive sessions. He insisted that the patient receive 7 sessions, then a break of a week, then 7 sessions, again a break of a week and the last 7 sessions. Jiang also did not allow courses to be held more than 2 times a year. At the same time, Jiang himself worked around this amplifier for 12 hours every day. Experts warned him that it was harmful. The most likely cause of Jiangs death in 2018 is prolonged exposure for 14 years to powerful EM radiation from this amplifier. He died of pneumonia at the age of 85, most likely due to a low level of immunity.
Komrakov visited Jiang in Khabarovsk at the very end of 2008. He completed a course of 21 sessions of 45 minutes in a Biotron with an amplifier. After that, vision improved significantly (it was +2.5) and never used glasses again. The pressure has also stabilized and some other parameters have improved. Komrakov believed in this technology and tried to negotiate with Jiang about cooperation. Jiang refused. Komrakov had to start looking for a more efficient version of the Biotron design. Six months later, he came up with such a design and in September 2009 received priority for the invention. The main idea of the invention was to transfer the active part of the sphere, which was located near the plants at a radius distance. Then the focal zone, which was inside the stand with plants, was transferred along with part of the sphere. This made it possible to form a joint focal zone in the center of the device. Figure 5 shows a view of the Biotron from patent RU 2533058 (Komrakov, 2012). The joint focal zone 6 is formed in the middle of the radius of both reflectors in the center of the device, where the bed for the patient is installed. Stands with plants are installed either on both sides of each reflector, or on one side next to the bed. The first EKOM Biotron under patent was built in 2010 in the city of Perm (Russia). Figure 6 shows the last EKOM Biotron of this design, which was built in Vietnam in 2018. The dimensions of the EKOM Biotron chamber were 4x4 meters. Due to the use of two reflectors, many times more plants, and a two-sided focal zone, the efficiency of the EKOM Biotron of this design was about 15 times more efficient than Jiangs Biotron. This made it possible to use the EKOM Biotron without an amplifier and do courses of 12 sessions with a session duration of 1 hour.
The strange color of the EKOM Biotron lighting is due to the fact that the activity of the main parameters of plant growth peaks in areas of blue and red light (Fig. 6A). The most effective is a mixture blue 25% and red 75%. Now special LED phytolamps and phytolents are being produced. In 2010, they were not released and had to make lighting consisting of 2 red and one blue LED strip.
The first two EKOM Biotrons were made of copper, as well as Jiangs Biotron. Then, both EKOM Biotrons and compact Biotrons were made of aluminum. This is due to the reflective properties of the metal. The radiation of plants was discovered by the Russian scientist Alexander Gurvich in 1923. To put it simply, he did experiments with onions. When two bulbs were next to each other and one of them was infected with rot, then the second bulb was infected with rot. When two bulbs were hermetically separated by glass, no infection occurred. When two bulbs were hermetically separated by quartz glass, infection occurred. From this, Gurvich concluded that there is information interaction between the bulbs through radiation in the ultraviolet (UV) range, which was later confirmed. Gurvich called the detected radiation mitogenetic. Jiang said that the best metal for Biotrons is gold, silver is possible, and copper is possible. However, judging by the graph of the reflectivity of different metals (Fig. 7), hard UV with wavelengths from 100 to 250 nanometers effectively reflects only aluminum. Neither gold, silver, nor copper in this range effectively reflect UV.
Plants and other young organisms that can be used as donors in Biotrons emit not only in the UV range. They can emit both in the infrared (IR) and terahertz ranges, UHF, microwave and even in ultrasound. In these ranges, copper, like aluminum, works well. But when using copper, the UV range is lost.
How is the volumetric focal zone of the Biotron formed?
The basic idea of all EKOM Biotrons is that the reflectors are installed at a distance of the radius of their curvature. This makes it possible to form a joint focal zone in the center of the device, where the person lies. An example of such a device is shown in Figure 8.
The area of each reflector is only 0.6 m
2
Figure 9 shows a part of the sphere and the optical axis OP from its center. Parallel to this optical axis, a beam AB is drawn at a distance of a. The greater the distance a, the closer point F is to the sphere (the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection).
If we take several parallel rays, they will form a line on the optical axis from point R/2 to point F with a length that depends on the distance a. The length of this line can be accurately calculated depending on the distance a and the radius R of the sphere by the formula:
This formula and its conclusion are given in the description of the patent RU 2533058 (Komrakov, 2012). The maximum distance a for the EKOM Biotron is 1500 mm, and for the Jiang Biotron 800 mm (half the length of the stand with plants). The estimated length of the focal line from point R/2 to point F will be 16 cm for the EKOM Biotron, and 13 cm for the Jiang Biotron.
The formation of such a line from point R/2 to point F is called spherical aberration. Spherical aberration is a serious drawback in most devices related to energy concentration. However, in the case of a Biotron, spherical aberration is a significant ADVANTAGE, since it allows you to form a volumetric focal zone with a size comparable to the zone of location of all major human organs. If we consider, for example, a parabola instead of a sphere, then it will form a focus at one point, and not a focal line. And this is a big disadvantage for Biotron. In addition, the parabola has a huge disadvantage due to the fact that its only one main optical axis and radiation only parallel to this axis will concentrate. The rest will dissipate. In the sphere, this is not the case at all, but more on that below.
In Figure 10, we have added a few more elements. Imagine a stream of rays parallel to the optical axis OR. In the vast majority of devices used in the world, such a stream comes from an infinitely remote point source (communications, radar, optics). Its a classic. However, a Biotron is not a classic and the same stream of parallel rays is formed from a stand with plants (shown in green), which is installed in the opening of a spherical reflector, of course with some distortions due to the close distance of the distributed source from the reflector, which will lead to a certain decrease in the quality of concentration, which is even useful for Biotron technology, where it is necessary to create a volumetric focal zone. All plants available on the stand in a Large Biotron (Fig. 6), of which approximately 250 thousand, radiating parallel to the optical axis of the OP will form a focal line FoF. Figure 10 shows the course of the rays from the blades of grass, which are located at points 15. At the same time, to form this focal line, a part of the sphere P1 with a size of 3000x2200 mm (projection of the size of the stand with plants on the sphere) will work. Thus, there will be 250 thousand parallel rays from 250 thousand blades of grass per area of the sphere with a size of 3000x2200 mm. And ALL these rays will be reflected from the sphere and form a focal line FoF 16 cm long!